Comparison

Carrington Labs vs. Prism Data

Prism Data provides cash flow underwriting products built from deposit-account transaction data.

At a glance

Capability
Carrington Labs
Prism Data
Standardized cash flow score
Yes — Cashflow Score, a standardized transaction-based risk score
Yes
Cash flow attributes and insights
Yes — engineered features plus Financial Health Summary metrics
Yes
Lender-specific Credit Risk Model
Yes — the core enterprise product
No
Models uses bureau, application and internal performance data
Yes — application, product and internal repayment history
CashScore requires loan performance data to be reported
Lender-specific feature engineering
Yes — engineered from the lender's own data and outcomes
No
Built against the lender’s own outcomes
Yes — calibrated to the lender's own observed outcomes
CashScore uses consortium data
Client-specific custom-model data boundaries
Yes — lender data never pooled into another lender's custom model
No, data is pooled in the consortium
Retraining included for the lender-specific model
Yes — included in the managed service
No
Additional features as lender data develops
Yes — new features engineered as data expands
No, standardized product features
Commercial objective alignment
Yes — aligned to approval, loss or margin objectives
Generic
Amount, term and price optimization
Yes — through the Credit Offer Engine
No
Fits existing decisioning systems
Yes — outputs fit existing decisioning workflows
Yes

Already using Prism Data?

Nothing needs to be switched off. Carrington Labs builds the model around your own outcomes, whatever the data mix — and CashScore or Prism attributes can be evaluated among the inputs, where your data rights allow.

The core difference

Carrington Labs offers a standardized Cashflow Score and goes further with lender-specific Credit Risk Models. We can combine cash flow, bureau, application, product and internal performance data, engineer features around the lender’s own portfolio, include retraining as outcomes develop, and connect risk to amount, term and price through the Credit Offer Engine.

The main difference is standardization versus portfolio-specific optimization. Prism Data supplies standardized cash flow products. Carrington Labs can build and manage the model around the lender’s own product, outcomes and commercial objectives.

Prism Data’s CashScore is built on consortium data spanning multiple lenders, products and credit profiles. It converts transaction history into a standardized cash flow risk signal that can be used alone or alongside traditional credit models and scores.

Carrington Labs can provide a standardized Cashflow Score, but its core enterprise capability is a lender-specific Credit Risk Model. The model can use cash flow alongside bureau, application, product and internal repayment data and is calibrated against the lender’s own observed outcomes.

Why Carrington Labs is the stronger fit

One provider from score to custom model

Carrington Labs gives lenders a path from a standardized Cashflow Score to a custom Credit Risk Model without changing the underlying analytics partner. The lender can start with a faster standardized signal and progress to portfolio-specific modeling when sufficient outcomes are available.

Cash flow is one input, not the limit

Transaction data can be highly predictive, but it is not the only relevant source. Carrington Labs can test and combine cash flow with bureau, application, product and internal performance data in one model.

Advanced lender-specific feature engineering

Carrington Labs engineers features around the lender’s product and performance definition. This goes beyond consuming a standard attribute library by testing which variables and interactions add predictive value for the lender’s own portfolio.

Included retraining

As the portfolio develops, Carrington Labs can retrain the model using newer outcomes, revisit calibration and build additional features where the expanded data supports them. Retraining is included in the managed model service.

Risk connected to amount, term and price

The Credit Offer Engine can use the model’s probability of default together with expected loss, revenue, funding and direct costs, expected take rate, price elasticity and lender constraints to recommend amount, term and price.

Why lenders choose Carrington Labs

Carrington Labs is built for lenders that want:

A standardized cash flow option
and a path to a lender-specific model.
Cash flow and traditional data
combined where relevant.
Advanced feature engineering
using their own performance outcomes.
Included retraining
as the portfolio develops.
Model development
aligned to approval, delinquency, loss or margin objectives.
Client-specific custom-model data boundaries.
Offer optimization
beyond a risk score.

FAQ

Does Carrington Labs offer a standardized cash flow score?
Yes. Carrington Labs offers Cashflow Score as a standardized transaction-based risk measure and can also develop a lender-specific Credit Risk Model.
Can Carrington Labs use Prism Data outputs?
Potentially. The model can incorporate available third-party attributes or scores where the lender has the required rights and the data proves useful. The exact integration depends on the lender’s data access and agreement.
Is a custom model always better than CashScore?
Not automatically. The answer should be tested on the lender’s own portfolio. A custom model becomes more relevant when the lender has sufficient outcomes and needs portfolio-specific calibration, feature engineering or commercial optimization.

More comparisons

See what a custom model adds beyond a cash flow score — tested on your portfolio

Use historical outcomes to test whether a lender-specific model improves risk separation and expected commercial value beyond a standardized cash flow score.

Comparison based on publicly available product information as of July 2026. Third-party names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Carrington Labs is not affiliated with or endorsed by the companies referenced unless expressly stated.